Princeton and other far left-leaning institutions like Al Jazeera, BBC, New York Times, the Anti Defamation Lague, Washinton Post, USA Today, NPR, have put together a study to highlight the successes of the Marxist Organizing group called Black Lives Matter, conveniently blaming the violence of well-funded activists and Communist Organizers and social justice concepts on the failings of America Institutions. The study it’self is meant to embarrass President Donald J. Trump before the election, but what it really does is expose the left for its cultural Marxist tactics turned into political attacks.
The study is said to be measuring the “risks” according to the authors who said, “These data reveal that the United States is in crisis. It faces a multitude of concurrent, overlapping risks — from police abuse and racial injustice, to pandemic-related unrest and beyond — all exacerbated by increasing polarization. This report maps these trends with a view toward the upcoming election when these intersecting risks are likely to intensify.”
The study promotes the longstanding plan of the Democrat party to defend and reform American Police Departments and tries to assign the paid political violence against supporters of President Donald J. Trump as some spontaneous uprisings as a result of the Drug-induced death of George Floyd in May.
Calling the historic violent uprisings, which have resulted in hundreds of federal offenses, arson, injury, demolition of federal property and destruction of local law enforcement and even murder as “mostly peaceful”, Princeton University exposes their radical ideology and intent to spread propaganda.
What is accurate is the locations of the Civil Disobedience and riots:
This study, showing the agenda, label the Government as “Violent”, in response to arson, murder, destruction of federal property and demolition of law enforcement.
The authors of the study show the mindset of the left by defending the BLM movement, saying “Overall, ACLED data indicate that government forces soon took a heavy-handed approach to the growing protest movement. In demonstrations where authorities are present, they use force more often than not. Data show that they have disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”
And conclude their study by saying:
“While these data present only a snapshot of demonstration activity and political violence in America, the trendlines are clear: demonstrations have erupted en masse around the country, and they are increasingly met with violence by state actors, non-state actors, and counter-demonstrators alike. With two months until the election, the US faces deep divisions over racial inequality, the role of the police, and economic hardship exacerbated by an ineffective pandemic response.
The administration has taken multiple steps to inflame these tensions, from announcing further federal deployments in “Democrat-led cities” like Chicago and Albuquerque (AP, 22 July 2020) to threatening a postponement of the election altogether (BBC, 30 July 2020).
In this hyper-polarized environment, state forces are taking a more heavy-handed approach to dissent, non-state actors are becoming more active and assertive, and counter-demonstrators are looking to resolve their political disputes in the street. Without significant mitigation efforts, these risks will continue to intensify in the lead-up to the vote, threatening to boil over in November if election results are delayed, inconclusive, or rejected as fraudulent.”
What is clear is that this study is the perfect example of where Princeton University is using its power to redirect Americans to embrace anti-American, and foreign propaganda meant to discredit a duly elected President. and how the media plays right into the plan.
The political attacks are not just on Trump, they are on Trump’s supporters and on the American voter. That is where the left has taken the country.